CPD - Case Discussion:
Participant: Dr. Sarah Jenkins, Dr. Mark Peterson
Date: 1 November 2024
Duration: 60 minutes
Location: Clinic Conference Room
Topics Discussed:
- Differential diagnosis of persistent lower back pain
- Management strategies for chronic Achilles tendinopathy
- Integration of manual therapy with exercise prescription
Case Reviews:
- Patient initials: A.B. - Discussion focused on a 45-year-old male presenting with chronic lumbar facet joint pain, unresponsive to initial conservative treatment. Reviewed imaging findings (MRI showed mild degenerative changes), discussed alternative manual therapy techniques (e.g., Mulligan mobilisations), and considered referral for pain management consultation if no further progress.
- Patient initials: C.D. - Discussion centered on a 30-year-old female marathon runner with recurring Achilles tendinopathy. Explored evidence-based loading programmes, footwear assessment, and the role of eccentric strengthening. Highlighted the importance of patient education on activity modification and gradual return to sport.
Learning Outcomes:
- Review the Case Content
- Reflect on Key Insights Gained
- Consider Changes to Your Practice
- Identify Skills or Competencies Developed
Summary of discussion:
The session provided an in-depth review of challenging osteopathic cases. Key discussion points included refining diagnostic approaches for complex musculoskeletal presentations, exploring advanced manual therapy techniques, and optimising rehabilitation strategies. The importance of interdisciplinary collaboration for refractory cases was also emphasised, along with the need for continuous learning in evidence-based practice.
Action Items:
- Dr. Jenkins: Research Mulligan mobilisation techniques for lumbar facet pain and prepare a brief presentation for the next session.
- Dr. Peterson: Review current literature on eccentric loading protocols for Achilles tendinopathy.
- Both: Incorporate a structured patient education checklist into initial consultations for chronic pain patients.
Reflection:
Participants found the session highly beneficial for professional growth. Dr. Jenkins specifically noted an increased confidence in managing chronic lower back pain after discussing varied treatment options. Dr. Peterson reflected on the importance of re-evaluating long-standing treatment plans and incorporating newer evidence for tendinopathies. Both felt that the peer discussion provided valuable new perspectives and reinforced critical thinking skills.
Additional Notes:
Next CPD session to focus on cervical spine dysfunction and headache management.
Supporting Evidence:
- Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy: "Effectiveness of Lumbar Mobilisation Techniques for Chronic Low Back Pain."
- British Journal of Sports Medicine: "Eccentric Exercise for Achilles Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review."
- NICE Guidelines: "Chronic Low Back Pain and Sciatica: Management of Adults."
CPD - Case Discussion:
Participant: [Name of participants] (Only include if explicitly mentioned in transcript, contextual notes, or clinical note, else leave blank. Do not omit the heading.)
Date: [Date of session] (Only include if explicitly mentioned in transcript, contextual notes, or clinical note, else leave blank. Do not omit the heading.)
Duration: [Duration of session] (Only include if explicitly mentioned in transcript, contextual notes, or clinical note, else leave blank. Do not omit the heading.)
Location: [Location of session] (Only include if explicitly mentioned in transcript, contextual notes, or clinical note, else leave blank. Do not omit the heading.)
Topics Discussed:
- [List all topics discussed during the session] (Only include if explicitly mentioned in transcript, contextual notes, or clinical note, else leave blank. Do not omit the heading. Write as a list with each topic on a separate line.)
Case Reviews:
- [Details of cases reviewed including patient initials without identifying information and key discussion points] (Only include if explicitly mentioned in transcript, contextual notes, or clinical note, else leave blank. Do not omit the heading. Do not include identifiable patient information. Write as a list with each case on a separate line.)
Learning Outcomes:
- [List of learning outcomes for this session] (Only include if explicitly mentioned in transcript, contextual notes, or clinical note, else leave blank. Do not omit the heading. Select from the following learning outcomes as applicable: Review the Case Content; Reflect on Key Insights Gained; Consider Changes to Your Practice; Identify Skills or Competencies Developed; Note Any Further Learning Needs. Write as a list.)
Summary of discussion:
- [Specific summary of topics discussed including key points, clinical insights, and professional development themes] (Only include if explicitly mentioned in transcript, contextual notes, or clinical note, else leave blank. Do not omit the heading.)
Action Items:
- [List of action items or follow-up tasks for the participants] (Only include if explicitly mentioned in transcript, contextual notes, or clinical note, else leave blank. Do not omit the heading. Write as a list with each action item on a separate line.)
Reflection:
- [Participants' reflections on the session including personal insights, learning experiences, and professional growth observations] (Only include if explicitly mentioned in transcript, contextual notes, or clinical note, else leave blank. Do not omit the heading.)
Additional Notes:
- [Any additional notes or comments] (Only include if explicitly mentioned in transcript, contextual notes, or clinical note, else leave blank. Do not omit the heading.)
Supporting Evidence:
- [Summary of any supporting evidence discussed including research papers, guidelines, clinical studies, or professional resources referenced] (Only include if explicitly mentioned in transcript, contextual notes, or clinical note, else leave blank. Do not omit the heading.)
(Only summarise and reformat information provided in the transcript, contextual notes, or clinical note. Do not generate new information, discussion points, or learning outcomes not explicitly mentioned. Do not invent participant names, case details, or action items. If information for a section is not mentioned, leave that section blank but retain the heading. Do not include identifiable patient information in case reviews. Write in a clear, professional continuing professional development tone.)